|
The BorderWare Security Platform (v7.1), running on the SP-800 appliance, had the worst false positive performance of any
product tested, and by a large margin: nine critical false positives and 171 bulk false positives. Its filtering rate was
96 percent of spam caught, an acceptable number but below the median. To reduce the false positives, you’ll need to count
on a training period of several weeks during which users inspect the quarantine carefully and whitelist the senders from whom
they want to receive e-mail.
Firewalls Complete - Beta Version:: FireWall-1 follows the security principle of All communications are denied The test methodology was carefully designed to simulate actual network http://www.blacksheepnetworks.com/security/info/fw/complete/chap14.htmHOME | Packeteer - Westcon Group:: Security. Vendors. Become a Vendor. Resellers. Current Promotions. Company Overview. Our Services Lab Test: Packeteer iShaper is the New King of CIFS http://www.lansystems.com.au/vendors/Packeteer.asp?objid=540&showall=newsHOME |
The BorderWare SP-800 is capable in some areas, but difficult to configure. Although LDAP configuration looks organized, it is hard to get right, exacerbated by help examples that are more often misleading than useful. The procedure is extremely clumsy: the initial
screens don’t suggest proper syntax, so you have to iron out the query in test mode (where help screens do provide useful
info), then edit it again in the initial LDAP setup until it finally works. Further, the LDAP settings are not carried over
from one part of LDAP to another; you need to configure five different queries to set up for domain, users, mail, aliases,
and so forth. Another annoyance, which can’t be changed, is that the admin interface times out after 30 minutes.
INFORMATION SECURITY MAGAZINE | Sizing Up E-mail Appliances:: Secure Platform, IronPort Systems IronPort C-Series Email Security Appliance Since we used a closed lab environment, we didnt fully test these technologies. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/magPrintFriendly/0,29,sid14_gci1257031,00.htmlHOME |
[ Compare spam filtering statistics for the mail security appliances tested. Compare their features. Return to “Test Center guide: Mail security appliances.” See reviews of the appliances from Barracuda, BorderWare, Cisco, Mirapoint, Proofpoint, Secure Computing, Sendio, Symantec, and Tumbleweed. ]
On the upside, the BorderWare interface is clean and easy to navigate, with context-sensitive help that is generally useful. The content management features were extensive and capable, with pre-built
lists of phrases available in several categories and the capability of applying weights so that it takes three or more offensive
words from one list, or two or more from another list to trigger the filter, for instance. The SP-800 can also inspect zip
archives and hold encrypted e-mail for inspection. The integrated URL filter intended to stop phishing and spyware by blocking
downloads and access to malicious sites worked reasonably well, but blocked legitimate sites while allowing access to some
bad ones. It stopped 77 percent of phishing messages and blocked 8 legitimate messages from banking sites.
BorderWare offers extensive enterprise-class features such as access control by user, group, or domain; good reporting and
notification controls; policy-based encryption; centralized management of multiple devices; clustering; IM protection; policy-based
rules; and the capability to integrate with F5 load balancers.
Pricing for the SP-800 is at the high end of the field, although not out of line for the rich feature set. However, considering
the middling filtering accuracy and high rate of false positives, most administrators will want to look at some of the alternatives
first.
Pre-Article:Confirmed: Microsoft and Facebook Friendship Next-Article:Salesforce Beats the Street, Raises Estimates |